City of St. Michael Begins Demolition of Two Downtown Buildings
The abandoned buildings on Central Avenue East were in a condition too poor for potential buyers to bring up to code.
The City of St. Michael is peeling into a piece of history.
In its demolition of two abandoned downtown buildings that began today, crews took down the outer layer of brick from one building, revealing the original, historic brick still underneath.
The sight of the contrast on the two-story building drew many people from nearby businesses peeking out of their windows and doors Wednesday afternoon to watch the demolition.
The buildings, located at 105 and 109 Central Ave. E, have been abandoned for approximately the past four to five years, according to the city's Community Development Director Marc Weigle.
The city's Economic Development Authority proposed the demolition to the St. Michael City Council, and the council unanimously approved the plan in a late-October meeting.
"We had a number of (potential buyers) look at it, but given the condition of the buildings and the cost of what it takes to bring them up to code, nobody could make it work," he said. "So we looked at it as a redevelopment opportunity to go in and clean it up, and eventually redevelop it into a higher and better use."
The smaller building used to be an office for a contractor, and the two-story building was used by a real estate business, he said. The buildings were both foreclosed and the city purchased them from the bank in August, Weigle said.
"They were becoming blighted," he said. "(The buildings) were used for graffiti — an eyesore."
The city's economic development authority is planning to market the plots of land jointly with the former site of Simonson Lumber Yard, that was lost to a fire in January.
"At this point, we're just cleaning the site (of the two buildings) up and intend to market the site along with property adjacent to it where the lumber yard used to be," Weigle said. "We put some signs out there, and we'll be working on the next steps to continue marketing."
Be sure to follow St. Michael Patch on Twitter, "Like" us on Facebook, and sign up for our newsletter, which sends you updates about stories, breaking news, announcements, events and blogs on our site.
Rick
9:22 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012
A gas station would be perfect there.
Arnie
10:20 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012
I thought Steg and Greves were opening in that location?
Penny
11:37 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Maybe a nice restaurant??
Arnie
11:58 am on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Absolutely! The guys who have started Steg and Greves are undoubtedly two of the top Restaurateurs in the Midwest.
Jim Dokken
12:10 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Isn't Steg and Greves an Italian restaurant? I love that place!!
Karen Corwin
1:01 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
I spent 3 or 4 years of my early life in that 2 story building, it was a cold water flat back in the 50's. There were 2 apartments upstairs
St. M resident
4:37 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Really? Interesting! That must be bittersweet to see them taken down. Do you have any memories of living there?
STMA Resident
3:56 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
Restaurants please...Panara, Noodles. Maybe a cute old fasion Soda Shop!
thetruth
4:22 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
They forgot to demolish the other eyesore down on the "Corner."
323
9:03 pm on Thursday, December 6, 2012
It would be nice to see the Corner Barf go as well.
David
9:40 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I wish I would have know they were taking this down. Looks like those bricks would have made nice pavers for some park in town or a patio at one of the schools or something worthwhile. We keep tearing down buildings around here, calling them eye sores, but the reality of it all is that the only historic biilding that we'll have in the future is the church, at least that's all we have listed on the Historic Sites register. Will that be deemed an eye sore as well? We already have a huge development that needs investors. Why clear more land for development? I know that there are many that want a brand new fully developed area. Do we need to wipe out STMA's history because of that?