patching...
Update: Click here to find and "like" St. Michael Patch on Facebook »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

HSUS President's Visit Concerns Some Minnesota Farmers

Wayne Pacelle, HSUS president and CEO, will be at Golden Valley's Animal Humane Society today to promote his new book. His visit has some local farmers worried that consumers will view common animal agriculture practices in a negative light.

 

Minnesota is home to more than 80,000 farms and currently leads the nation in turkey production. The majority of farmers in animal agriculture today use cages to contain their animals—something that Humane Society of the United States President Wayne Pacelle isn't happy about.

"Animals built to move should be allowed to move," Pacelle said, referring to animals that are raised in cages. "Jamming laying hens in barren battery cages where they're shoulder to shoulder is just not right."

Today, Pacelle will visit Golden Valley's Animal Humane Society to talk about his new book and address other local animal care issues, like the treatment of animals raised for food and Minnesota's wolf hunt.

His visit to a farming state has some animal agriculture leaders concerned that he will give the wrong message to listeners and consumers.

“HSUS is creating misinformation in the consumer’s mind of how we take care of animals and it sheds a light that’s not accurate,” said Steve Olson, executive director of the Minnesota Turkey Growers Association (MTGA) and Chicken and Egg Association of Minnesota (CEAM). “In agriculture, our function in society is to provide people with food. Farmers have done a great job of increasing production through science and technology. Groups like HSUS are going against that. They are part of the problem, not part of the solution.”

Based in Buffalo, MN, MTGA and CEAM represent about 800 turkey, chicken and egg farmers, poultry companies, and affiliated members.

Pacelle and HSUS are forcing farmers and members of MTGA and CEAM to examine their production practices. Pacelle said a great local example of his effort to build a humane economy, which is a theme in his new book, comes from HSUS’s work in the egg industry.

“Traditionally, HSUS fought with a lot of conventional producers in the egg industry,” Pacelle said, referring to disagreements about keeping hens in cages. “Eventually, we decided to sit down together ... and we began to understand each other.”

At the beginning of this year, HSUS and the United Egg Producers (UEP), the trade association that represents 88 percent of the egg industry, partnered to create a bill that would force egg farmers to almost double the amount of space that they’re currently required to give their hens, among other requirements. If the law passes in Congress, it will become the first federal law that addresses animal treatment on farms.

The bill requires all egg farmers in the Untied States to phase out the use of their current cages and construct new, enriched cages throughout their barns, which would give hens more space. Olson said the barn renovations would be costly to farmers, forcing them out of the industry.

“[The legislation] is going to require twice as many resources and we’re going to have farmers go out of business,” Olson said. “A farmer’s primary concern is the health and well-being of their animals, and we can’t produce a good product if our animals are stressed or sick.”

Pacelle said the United Egg Producers are enthusiastic about the proposed law. “I’ve been to the facilities of these producers, and just about all of them say they can do it. We don’t want a patchwork of different state rules, we want one national standard for a commodity.”

Though most egg producers support the bill, other farming groups say that this kind of law will set a precedent moving forward. The National Pork Producers Council, the National Cattlemen and Beef Association, the National Turkey Federation, and the American Farm Bureau Federation have come out in opposition to the bill.

"I don't have a problem with someone that has a difference of opinion in the way that we raise animals," Olson said. "But groups like HSUS are trying to take away choices from consumers. And I don't think that's right."

  • Should Congress pass federal legislation that requires all egg farmers to give hens in cages more space? Explain your vote in the comments below.

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        5 (33%)
    • No
        10 (66%)
    Total votes: 15
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Chicken and Egg Association of Minnesota, Farming, HSUS, and Minnesota Turkey Growers Association

Ken

6:12 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I know of several egg farmers who do not support this legislation. Those egg farmers saw earlier this year what happened in Europe when they enacted similar legislation and the shortage of eggs lead to a spike in egg prices. At a time when food prices are going up, we don't need legislation on production practices that is not founded in science.

Reply

Britt

7:06 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

If the legislation passes I hope we don't see all of the small family farms close up shop. It is a daunting task for the next generation in the egg business to figure out how to obtain the money necessary to complete the production changes laid out in the legislation. Egg farmers just want to provide safe, quality, wholesome eggs to America's families.

Reply

Karen Tirandazi

9:11 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

The welfare of farm animals needs to be addressed! Many people are now buying cafe-free eggs because of the horrendous treatment of chickens. Please watch the videos that show the reality of how most chickens are raised in cages that are far too small, crammed with multiple chickens, and have only wire floors. Let's start with the worst cases first - the factory farms!

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Valerie Engler

9:49 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Karen, good comments. Consumers today have the choice to buy many types of products. In talking to Steve, he directed me to this site where a few producers have videos that take you inside their barns. Check out this link for a video that features Dr. Jeff Erickson of Michael Foods: http://minnesotaturkey.com/ceam/

Comment_arrow

Rooster One

11:11 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Karen chickens are not being treated horrendously. If they were, they would not be producing eggs, they would be dying. You should have the right top buy "cage-free" eggs if you wish. But you do not have the right to force your views on others. Do you know what happen when we brought flocks inside, got them off the floor and housed them in smaller groups? Mortality plummeted! The hens are telling us something very important in that fact. The last people we need telling farmers how to raise their animals is the federal government. Consumers and farmers can work it out just fine amongst themselves. And, there are groups out there, like PETA and HSUS who flat don't want us using animals period. They have no right to remove my choices!

Ken

10:48 am on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

I wonder how many of those egg farmers who support this realize that if the ammonia levels exceed 25 ppm, those eggs cannot be sold. It's very difficult for egg farmers to absolute guarantee their ammonia levels will not go above 25 ppm. Interesting that OSHA sets the upper limit for ammonia affecting humans at 50 ppm.

Below is the language from the bill itself. Section 7A references acceptable air. Notice Section 3(c)(1)

SEC. 3. ENFORCEMENT OF HEN HOUSING AND TREATMENT STANDARDS.

(a) In General- Section 8 of the Egg Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 1037) is amended--
(1) by re-designating subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) as subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g), respectively;
(2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new subsection:
`(c)(1) No person shall buy, sell, or transport, or offer to buy or
sell, or offer or receive for transportation, in any business or
commerce any eggs or egg products derived from egg-laying hens housed
or treated in violation of any provision of section 7A (25 ppm).

Reply

Terry Ward

7:26 pm on Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Maybe it’s time to stop calling pigs in steel traps and sardine-can chickens and miles of semi-immobile cows ‘farming’.
This is not farming.

This never was ‘farming’.

It is assembly-line food animal production/processing.

There are farmers and there are assembly-line food producers.



Farming is an honorable endeavor.

There is nothing honorable in animals traveling through automated assembly lines like Toyotas and radios, so why not just man up and stop pretending it is anything other then mechanized food production?

Reply

Leave a comment