Distracted Driving Could Be a Danger for Wright County Deputies

A group of student researchers from St. Mary's University of Minnesota (SMU) have concluded that the amount of technology inside a police squad car directly contributes to a growing number of police-involved auto crashes.

Officials from SMU, the League of Minnesota Cities and the Washington County Sheriff's Office held a press conference Wednesday to discuss the report and its impact on law enforcement in Minnesota.

Wright County Capt. Dan Anselment, an Albertville native, was there, representing local law enforcement.

"It's an important thing to look at," said Sheriff Joe Hagerty in a talk with St. Michael Patch last summer. "All of that technology can be distracting."

Conducted at the request of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), the Graduate School of Public Safety Administration study focuses on 378 police-involved crashes between 2006-10. 

According to the SMU study, the total cost of the 378 closed crashes was $1,188,666, with distracted driving accounting for 14 percent of claims and 17 percent of costs.

Moreover, technology inside the squad car was said to have played a role in 12 percent of claims and account for 24 percent of costs.

The numbers seem negligible until the study reveals: "It should be noted however, that 48 percent of the closed claim files did not state clearly whether the crash was influenced by technology as reported by the claims adjuster or officer."

At the time of the study, the researchers were also not given access to 47 open cases of police-involved auto crashes between 2006-10, which they admit could further prove their conclusions.

SMU researchers also noted in their limitations section a distinct culture within law enforcement that may be skewing some of the data.

Put simply, officers may not be completely truthful when recounting the details of a crash for fear of disciplinary action.

The study states:

"Individual departmental policies and procedures presented an additional difficulty in gathering accurate data. An officer will be closely scrutinized following involvement in a work related crash. An officer who shows inattention, carelessness, or distraction while performing essential duties is at-risk for departmental discipline. Ultimately, discipline may lead to termination. It is understood that an officer may weigh these factors when giving a statement regarding the facts of a crash."

Hagerty didn't think it was a huge issue here, as crashes involving squad cars have been minimal. But, as the county looks to replace its fleet of vehicles, studies like this can only help with safety.

Anselment and Wright County Community Safe Communities' Pat Hackman, who both attended yesterday's press conference, will bring their findings back to the county and deal with anything they see that could be localized.

Down the road, Orono Police Chief Correy Farniok said his department has had only one crash involving an officer since 2006.

“That was during a pursuit,” he said.

Chief Farniok went on to stress that modern technology allows crash investigators to determine whether an officer was on the phone, texting or otherwise distracted in the seconds preceding a crash.

“All of our squad cars are equipped with cameras that also record audio,” he said. “If there is a crash they record the previous 15 seconds, and we can tell if they were on the phone, texting inappropriately or whatever.”

As for officers being completely truthful, Chief Farniok clearly laid out the policy of his department, which he said is mirrored by departments across the state.

“It’s better to be truthful, because if I find out you lie during the course of an investigation there will be either a long-term suspension or termination—there’s no discretion,” he said.

The researchers are also calling for the creation of a statewide program in which law enforcement officers are trained to recognize the increased risk associated with the use of technology while driving.